1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA Marrufo was able to interview three staff members. S1 stated that he/she spoke with RP and RP said on R1s birthday they brought him/her money. S1 didn’t see it. S1 told RP that they should not be giving him money because he/she gives out the money to other people. R1 gives R2 money to buy sodas. When R1 has money, R1 always wants R2 to buy a soda. Sometimes we find shirts of R1 in other places and R1 gets stressed out. R1s black jacket is the one in the room. S1 have seen him with a brown jacket, that black puffy jacket, and a blue one that R1 has on right now. S1 haven’t seen R1s hearing aids.
According to S2, around November 26th or 27th, the receptionist mentioned to S2 that R1 had $80 stolen. We told them we would do everything we can to investigate. We told RP in the future to not give R1 money personally but to give it to us so we can keep it in the safe. We looked at the security camera and we did not see anyone leave the room. We asked R2 if he/she took the money and he said no. We don’t know if R1 gave R2 money to go to the store. We asked R2 if he/she did and said no, but R1 does not always remember everything. S2 had never seen that black puffy jacket before. S2 has seen one with a Raiders jacket and a blue jacket and a red one. R1 had about 3-4 different ones. R1 has been missing the hearing aids for about a year. We have notified R1s family about that. R1 keeps taking them out and won’t let the staff put them on the charger. R1 would not let the staff take them out of his/her ears at night to put them on the charger. They went missing for a long time. He had not ordered new ones that I know of.
LPA Marrufo also interviewed R2 and it was mentioned that R1 never gave money to buy anything for him/her.
Based on records review, the jacket and money was not logged on either the Safeguard for Properties and Valuables form nor the money logged on Cash resources log. Additionally, according to the theft and loss policy of the facility, included in the admissions agreement, the facility reserves the right to review aII valuables retained by the Resident and accepts neither responsibility not liability for loss of money or valuables unless they are deposited and inventories with Montecito Manor for safekeeping. Residents are not allowed to bring in valuables. Montecito Manor requires the Responsible Party provide a complete inventory of all personal property (brought into Montecito Manor) and that no jewelry be brought in over $100 in value.
Based on interviews and ecords review, the department has determined that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Report is reviewed and copy is provided
page 2 of 2 |