1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 11/25/2025 the Department 2 additional staff (S4 and S5). S4 stated he/she was not working on 10/20/2025. S2 statesd he/she did not see any documentation that R1’s physician was notified about R1 not feeling on 10/16/2025 and 10/19/2025. S5 stated R1 was assessed (vitals taken) by a MedTech on 10/16/2025 and 10/19/2025 when R1 stated he/she was not feeling well. S5 stated R1 was assessed at ‘baseline’ by a Medtech on 10/16/2025 and 10/19/2025. S5 states it is the responsibility of the Medtech to inform a resident’s physician about a change in condition. GM states on 10/16/2025, the physician was not notified due to the MedTech assessing R1 and determining R1 to be at ‘baseline.’
Review of R1’s progress notes dated 10/12/2025 to 10/25/2025, notes on 10/16/2025, a progress note category at 2:00PM ‘Alert Charting’ R1 was noted as ‘might be sick’. On 10/19/2025, a progress note category at 5:40AM ‘Change of Condition’ notes R1 to have change in bowel movements.
The Department requested documentation of the dates and times when R1’s responsible parties were notified about R1 not feeling well on 10/16/2025 and the change of condition noted on 10/19/2025. The facility was unable to provide documentation that R1’s responsible party and physician had been notified.
Review of R1’s emergency room discharge paperwork dated 10/20/2025 to 10/22/2025, R1 was noted with discharge on the eyelids, conjunctivitis was listed as one of the diagnoses.
Based on LPA’s observations, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is/are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099 D. An exit interview was conducted with General Manager (GM) Candace Bolin and a copy of this report was provided. Appeal rights were also provided.
Page 2 of 2
END OF REPORT
|