1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | This is an amended report 10/23/2025 to change the findings from unsubstantiated to unfounded.
W1 stated he/she had a meeting on 7/28/2025 and came to a 'mutual agreement' regarding the choice of pharmacy and fees for Resident R1. W1 stated the facility refunded the pharmacy fees charged to R1. W1 stated he/she agreed with the terms of pharmacy and was 'satisfied.' W1 stated R1 received the letter regarding the pharmacy but did not understand the pharmacy change.
LPA interviewed ED. ED states all residents were informed of the preferred pharmacy and fees by letter on 5/27/2025. ED states residents still have the option to choose their own pharmacy. ED stated the facility had a meeting with W1 on 7/28/2025 regarding the choice of pharmacy and fees for R1. ED stated the facility explained to W1 the terms of the preferred pharmacy for R1. ED stated W1 agreed with the terms for the preferred pharmacy for R1.
LPA interviewed Staff S1. S1 states he/she was part of the meeting with W1 and ED on 7/28/2025. S1 stated he/she explained how the preferred pharmacy would work for R1. S1 stated W1 agreed to the terms of the preferred pharmacy.
LPA reviewed R1's Resident Pharmacy Enrollment Form dated and signed by W1 on 7/28/2025. LPA reviewed a letter from the facility dated 5/27/2025, informing residents about the facility preferred pharmacy and fees. The letter states " For residents who do not choose to utilize the preferred pharmacy, charges will begin on...July 2025. Please note that residents were notified of this charge either upon moving in or their annual rate adjustment letters sent earlier this year."
This agency has investigated the complaint alleging staff do not permit residents' to choose their pharmacy, and staff did not notify resident's responsible party of fee increase. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.
No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit based on California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director (ED) Alex Baiasu. A signed copy of this report was provided.
Page 2 of 2
End of Report. |