1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | continued
During the investigation, it was reported that a staff person was assisting a resident by getting her from her wheelchair to her bed when the resident became combative. It was stated that the staff person tried to put up her hands to block the resident from hitting her and placed her hands on the resident’s forearms and by doing so, caused skin tears and bruising. It was reported that the staff person noticed blood on the resident’s clothing and called for the facility nurse to come and assist. The nurse arrived and applied steri-strips to the resident’s arms; it was reported that the resident did not complain of any pain and soon thereafter went to sleep. The following day, the health care director contacted the physician, and he recommended that the resident be sent out to the hospital for further evaluation. It was stated that the resident did not remember the incident due to her dementia status.
It was reported that the staff person was terminated from her position, as she did not follow the protocol of the facility’s policy when a resident is being combative. It was stated that the staff should have called in another staff person to “trade out” staff persons when the resident became combative. Although it was stated that the staff person was remorseful and trained, the resident suffered serious skin tear injuries.
Based on investigation observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the facility representative listed above and an exit interview was conducted. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due date, civil penalties may be assessed.
|