| Staff is retaliating against resident for a complaint – UNSUBSTANTIATED
It was alleged that staff retaliated against a resident as a result of a prior complaint being filed. The form of the retaliation was the facility took the male residents on a camping trip but did not take the female residents.
During staff interviews it was learned that the facility took the male clients on a camping trip but did not take Client 1 (C1). The reason the female clients did not go on the trip was to keep C1 safe.
Administrator stated We didn’t feel that we could have provided enough supervision to keep C1 safe on the trip. Instead of the women going on the camping trip we rented an Air BNB, they went to the Oasis fun center, an alpaca farm, out to lunch and breakfast. The girls were fine with that.
It was determined that there if no evidence that staff retaliated against C1 as a result of a prior complaint, therefore this allegation is unsubstantiated.
Staff not following physician's orders - UNSUBSTANTIATED
LPA review of documents revealed that C1’s physician issued a “Generic prescription for check blood sugar once daily” dated May 25, 2022. LPA reviewed a fax from the pharmacy dated September 27, 2022 for a prescription that was written on 06/09/2022 for an Accu-Check Aviva Plus Meter. This same fax included a denial from C1’s insurance company due to patient not fitting eligibility. LPA review of C1’s physician report dated 6/15/2021 does not include a diabetes diagnosis.
LPA interview with Far Northern Regional Center Service Coordinator revealed that C1 has recently been taken off the drug Metformin.
During staff interviews it was learned that staff have been testing C1’s blood sugar daily since September 2022.
Continued on LIC9099-C
|