1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the interview process, several staff persons were interviewed. The resident was not interviewed, as he has since passed. An attempt was made to interview the hospice nurse; however, she did not return the call. Various documents were obtained and reviewed to include Physicians Report, Admission Agreement, Appraisal and Needs, Incident Reports, and a list of staff names.
During the investigation process, it was reported that the resident was on hospice. It was stated that the resident was fairly young (in his 60s) and that he had a propensity to get out of bed, as he was physically able to do so. The resident attempted to get out of bed and the staff person on shift heard the resident fall. The staff person went to the resident’s aid to assist. Shortly thereafter, two other staff arrived to assist with the resident. It was stated that since the resident was on hospice, the protocol was to contact that hospice nurse for an evaluation. It was reported that it took the hospice nurse nearly 45 minutes to arrive at the facility. The resident sustained a wound to the head and was bleeding. Once the hospice nurse arrived, she then made contact with the resident’s daughter to see if “they” should contact emergency services.
Although the resident did not sustain a serious injury, the staff should have contacted emergency services and had the paramedics assist in determining the resident’s need for hospitalization. When the paramedics did arrive, it was determined that the resident did need medical attention and was taken to the hospital. The resident did not get medical attention in a timely manner.
Based on investigation observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the facility representative listed above and an exit interview was conducted. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due date; civil penalties may be assessed.
|