1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Four parents were interviewed on 7/1/24, and 7/11/24 P1 - P2 and P4 had no knowledge of the allegations and stated that they were unaware of the children being invited to go to the side yard when the children were upset. P3 stated staff invite children to go to the side yard to take space. P3 also stated that P3 has never witnessed a child being unsupervised.
Three children were interviewed on 5/10/24 and 7/26/24 and C2 -C3 denied the allegation stating that the door to the side yard stays open. C8 confirmed the allegation and stated that C8 thinks that the door is closed but was not sure.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated.
During today’s inspection, the facility was toured and LPA did not observe any children in care.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the licensee Julie Helart. Appeal rights were provided.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. |