1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099
CD denied the allegation. A1, A3-A5 stated they didn’t receive help to supervise children when it was needed. A6-A7, A9 & A11 stated they do not believe adequate supervision is being provided, additionally, A4 stated parent received biting incident reports, but no one saw incident. A7 stated, two scrapes on child’s elbow, one elbow had a Band-Aid on it with fresh blood from the school, but didn't receive a verbal or written report of incident, A11 stated their child was not taken care of as they needed to be, so they disenrolled child and A12 stated there are a lot of complaints about being short staffed and adequate supervision isn't being provided. LPA’s interviews conducted and incident reports obtained corroborate the incidents as alleged.
Based on LPAs interviews conducted, documents obtained and record review(s), the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met, therefore, the allegation is determined to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D.
Appeal rights were provided. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was read and discussed with the Assistant Director (AD) Nakia Orlando.
The Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days. |