1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | L1 was interviewed on 11/14/2024. L1 stated that on 10/31/24 she arrived earlier than the normal pick up time (sign out time of 1:52pm) due to it being Halloween. L1 said that C1 was asleep when she arrived and she woke up C1 and helped C1 up and they left the child care center. L1 denied being rough with C1.
Interviews with center staff S1, S2 and S3 all state that L1 arrived while all the children were asleep including C1. L1 walked to C1 and tapped C1 on the shoulder multiple times and C1 did not wake. L1 then picked up the C1 by the arms or wrists and walked towards the exit gate in the classroom. C1 was not walking and her feet were dragging across the floor. When C1 reached the gate, C1 woke up and started walking. C1 and L1 then left the child care center. Center staff S1, S2 and S3 provided written declarations of their observations of the incident.
LPA interviewed parent P1. P1 said that all of her children have gone to L1's facility. P1 drops off C1 at the child care center and L1 picks up C1 in the afternoon every day. P1 stated that C1 has never mentioned to her that L1 handles her roughly or in a way that hurts her. P1 said that none of her children have complained about L1 in a way that would violate a child's personal rights. P1 said that she trusts L1 with her children and that C1 has never showed signs of being afraid of L1 or not wanting to go to L1's facility.
LPA attempted to interview child C1 on 11/14/24 but was not able to qualify C1 to be interviewed. C1 was unable to identify colors and was unable to explain the difference between a lie and truth. During the attempted interview, LPA did not visually observe any marks or bruising on arms or wrists of C1.
L1's staff L2 was interviewed on 11/14/24. L2 stated that L2 was with center staff who were documenting L2 identification for future pick up's at the center so L2 did not observe the situation that is alleged.
Based on the evidence obtained, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation that the licensee handled child roughly which is a violation of the child's personal rights is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D.
Appeal Rights were provided and exit interview conducted.
The Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. |