1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Ten staff (S1-S10) were interviewed on 2/16/26, 2/23/26 and 3/5/26. S10 stated that they witnessed S1 handle C1 in a rough manner. S10 stated that C1 was slammed on a cot and pat on the back roughly by S1. S1 stated they did not think C1 was slammed on a cot, nor do they think they were patting C1 too rough. S5 stated they did not observe S1 handle C1 in a rough manner. S5 stated they did not witness any staff patting children in a rough manner. S2 stated that they work with S1 and they have not seen S1 handle children in a rough manner. S7-S9 were not present for the alleged incident, but stated they have witnessed S1 handle infants in a rough manner.
On 5/26/26 two parents were interviewed (P1 and P2). P1 and P2 stated that they have not witnessed staff handle infants in a rough manner.
A copy of the children's roster was provided and reviewed.
During the course of the investigation, interviews and observations were conducted. Based off of conflicting information received during interviews, the findings are unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Appeal rights were provided and exit interview conducted.
This report was reviewed and discussed with the director Lisa Erlandsson-Ward. Appeal rights were provided. |