1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to LS's statement his roles and responsibilities consisted of dropping off food and supplies and completing administrative duties, he confirmed he lives at his other property more than 50% of the time. LS stated he moved out of the home in 2022 and he resumes his administrative duties off site. On average, LS visited the facility three times per week, times varying from three to four hours and some days it is more. LS acknowledged he was required to reside in the home as well as be present at least 80% of the time, and LS's temporary absence was not to exceed more than 20%. LS agreed to take some positive steps to bring the facility into compliance by moving back into the home and he intends to maintain a presence of at least 80% of the time, to ensure complaint with California Code of Regulations (CCR) 102417(a), which indicates that the licensee shall be present in the home and shall ensure that children in care are supervised at all times. When circumstances require the licensee to be temporarily absent from the home, the licensee shall arrange for a substitute adult to care for and supervise the children during his/her absence. Temporary absences shall not exceed 20 percent of the hours that the facility is providing care per day.
According to S1 and S2's statements, LS purchased another property, LS did not reside at the facility, and although LS did not reside in the home; LS visited the home between 2-3 times per week. Staff validated the facility's operating hours were Mon through Fri, 7:00am-5:30pm, and S1 and S2 managed the day to day operation at the facility without LS being present at least 80% of the time. Staff further added that during LS's visits to the home, LS brought groceries/food items and handled the administrative duties of the facility. Based on observations as well as statements provided by LS, S1 and S2; there is enough evidence to corroborate that LS did not comply with the regulations mentioned above.
Based on interviews with licensee and staff, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the licensee, Sarpreet Khakha. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Appeal rights were provided.
|