1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC 9099.
LS further stated that the facility’s policy on discipline involves first providing a child with a warning if misbehaving, followed by a discussion regarding the behavior, including an explanation of why the behavior is unsafe, and resolving the issue. Interview from Staff (S1) stated when children are misbehaving, they are first given a warning and then spoken to about their behavior, collaborating with LS’ statement. S1 also stated that children are then advised to try again. Additionally, S1 stated that children would be separated to redirect the situation.
Furthermore, LS and S1 stated that there have not been any recent incidents of children bullying others that resulted in an injury. LS and S1 stated that if an injury were to occur, the child would be assessed, and the parents would be notified. LS did state that there was a past incident involving two former daycare children who were bullying each other.
From a child interview, (C1) stated that LS had previously poked them in the cheek. In addition, statement from adult (A4) claimed their child was previously hit by another child and was not notified of the incident. Interviewed conducted by Children (C1 - C2) and Adults (A2 – A4) did not have any current concerns with the allegations filed against the facility.
Based on the information gathered during this investigation, although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred and therefore are determined to be unsubstantiated. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited. This report was reviewed and discussed with Facility Representative, Kajol Kumar. Appeal rights were provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days from today's visit.
|