1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews revealed Loving Place Facility “did not have a means to evacuate; their plan was to call 911” instead. Statements obtained from Emergency Services revealed ambulances were limited to medical emergencies due to the high volume of 911 calls in the area involving the LNU Complex Fire. Statements revealed facility staff/caregiver contacted 911 to evacuate all 4 residents and 3 staff from the facility in 1 ambulance vehicle. Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT) assessed the residents and determined one resident (R1), who was on hospice and with a respiratory medical complaint (low oxygen saturation), could be evacuated via ambulance. Statements revealed staff on shift did not have a plan of where to transport R1 and suggested R1 be transported to a nearby evacuation center. EMTs stated (to the facility staff) that they would not transport and leave R1 at an evacuation center. Additionally, stating R1 could only be transported to a Hospital, as the ambulance services are only available to individuals to be taken to the Hospital for medical emergencies/complaints. EMTs stated they could not evacuate 7 individuals (4 residents and 3 staff) in the ambulance and staff should transport the other residents in the staff’s (S2) car. EMTs statements revealed staff were calling 911 to attempt to evacuate an additional resident in a wheelchair by ambulance as EMTs were leaving the scene with R1.
Statements indicated that on 08/29/2020 there was one car at the facility belonging to staff (S2), which interviews revealed the car was low on gasoline. Additionally, interviews revealed S2 was reluctant to evacuate any residents and/or other staff on shift due to the maximum seating capacity of their car and insufficient gasoline. S2’s car was reportedly described as a “small 5-seater Honda” and may have had personal items in the car which further added to the issue of available space for seating staff and residents. Staff interviews indicated 2 residents use wheelchairs and 2 residents use walkers. In addition, witnesses stated 4 residents and 3 staff (for a total of 7 persons) as well as 2 wheelchairs, 2 walkers and resident (R1)’s oxygen tank(s) would not have been able to safely fit in S2’s car to evacuate. The facility’s Emergency and Disaster Plan for Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly indicated on page 5 of 9, Evacuation Procedures under section Identify transportation needs states: “The administrator and the administrator designee will use their personal vehicles for transportation, in case of an emergency”. Based on information received, staff did not properly engage the Facility’s Evacuation Procedure due to: staff (S2) not wanting to utilize their car to evacuate residents; Licensee arrived at the facility to drop off groceries earlier that day and left the facility; and Administrator was unable to reach the facility in a timely manner due to Police roadblocks.
Based on LPA's observations, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation “Staff fails to execute emergency disaster plan” is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Exit interview conducted with Rajwant "Goldie" Minhas, Administrator, who's signature below confirms receipt of this report. Appeal Rights Provided
|