1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | responded to several calls from 8/23/2022-8/28/2022 to complete the discharge process for R1. I2 also stated that the facility's reason for not accepting R1 was due to concerns of R1 re-inuring themselves.
Upon review of R1's Physician's Reports LIC602, prior to and after R1's surgery, LPA found that R1 had been diagnosed from ambulatory to non-ambulatory and required toileting assistance. However, LPA found that no additional levels care were required for R1 that the facility could not meet based on restricted health conditions. Although R1 was determined non-ambulatory upon discharge, the facility is still to provide basic activities of daily living (ADL) care and based on Title 22 regulations, not a valid reason to refuse accepting R1 back under the facility's care.
Based on a tour of the facility, interviews with staff and outside parties, review of resident records and observations, the allegation, facility imposed unlawful eviction is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met.
California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal Rights Given. |