<meta name="robots" content="noindex">
Department of
SOCIAL SERVICES

Community Care Licensing


COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT

Facility Number: 486803806
Report Date: 08/27/2026
Date Signed: 08/27/2026 03:31:16 PM

Unsubstantiated


STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
SANTA ROSA RO, 1450 NEOTOMAS AVENUE, STE. 100
SANTA ROSA, CA 95405
This is an official report of an unannounced visit/investigation of a complaint received in our office on
05/24/2026 and conducted by Evaluator Elias Magdaleno
COMPLAINT CONTROL NUMBER: 21-AS-20260524201159
FACILITY NAME:VILLAGE AT RANCHO SOLANO ASSISTED LIVING, THEFACILITY NUMBER:
486803806
ADMINISTRATOR:RAMOS, MAYFACILITY TYPE:
740
ADDRESS:3350 CHERRY HILLS COURTTELEPHONE:
(707) 425-3588
CITY:FAIRFIELDSTATE: CAZIP CODE:
94534
CAPACITY:250CENSUS: 129DATE:
08/27/2026
UNANNOUNCEDTIME BEGAN:
11:30 AM
MET WITH:Regional Director of Operations, Jesse SiasTIME COMPLETED:
03:50 PM
ALLEGATION(S):
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Staff did not obtain medical care for resident in a timely manner
Staff instructed resident to stay in their room
Licensee does not ensure staff have required training
Staff did not ensure resident's incontinence needs were being met
INVESTIGATION FINDINGS:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magdaleno arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with Regional Director of Operations, Jesse Sias.

During the course of this investigation LPA conducted interviews, made observations, and reviewed records.

Licensee does not ensure staff have required training – Reporting Party (RP) alleges that staff are not given required training by Licensee. Interviews with management indicated that upon hire staff undergo 40 hours of computer training followed by 16 hours of shadowing another caregiver before they are able to provide direct assistance to residents. Following this staff receive 20 hours of training yearly. Further interviews with management indicated that in-service training occurs as a result of new incidents/resident behaviors or based upon questions from staff. Interview with staff indicated that aside from required computer training there are regular in-service trainings on varying topics.
Continued LIC9099C...
Unsubstantiated
Estimated Days of Completion:
SUPERVISORS NAME: Victoria Bertozzi
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Elias Magdaleno
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/27/2026
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/27/2026
This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years.
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 1 of 2
Control Number 21-AS-20260524201159
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
SANTA ROSA RO, 1450 NEOTOMAS AVENUE, STE. 100
SANTA ROSA, CA 95405
FACILITY NAME: VILLAGE AT RANCHO SOLANO ASSISTED LIVING, THE
FACILITY NUMBER: 486803806
VISIT DATE: 08/27/2026
NARRATIVE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Continued from LIC9099...

Further interviews with staff indicated these in-services can range from group training's to being given pamphlets to read on their own. Review of ten (10) of ten (10) staff training records indicated that staff are receiving the required training hours as per Title 22 regulations. Review of in-service training logs indicated that staff are receiving additional training hours on topics not covered by initial 40 hours or annual 20 hours of training.
Staff did not ensure resident's incontinence needs were being met – RP alleges that resident (R1) was not provided incontinence care when required. Review of Care notes indicated that R1 was returning to the facility from the hospital and a bed was being assembled for them, third party medic advised R1 that they were wearing incontinence supplies and could use them. Review of Care Notes indicated that R1 did require incontinence care, however, as they had just returned from the hospital staff felt R1 was too unstable to be moved multiple times and elected to wait “a few minutes” until the bed was assembled. R1 was then moved to the bed and changed. RP alleges that R1 could have been taken to the bathroom and changed instead of being made to wait. Interviews with management indicated that staff may have been able to move R1 to the bathroom without incident, however, waiting to use the bed for a more stable platform was to ensure safety.

Staff did not obtain medical care for resident in a timely manner and Staff instructed resident to stay in their room – RP alleges that R1 was presenting behaviors that should have resulted in emergency services, however, facility staff did not send the resident to the hospital and instead told R1 to stay in their room. Interviews with Health and Wellness Director (HWD) indicated that resident presented with blurry vision and facility staff called emergency services to have them sent to the hospital. Interview with Health and Wellness Coordinator indicated that as soon as they were made aware of residents symptoms they called emergency services. Interview with Memory Care Director (MCD) indicated that emergency services were activated when R1 presented stroke like symptoms. Interview with staff (S1) indicated that resident initially did not present with any symptoms indicative of a stroke and stated they were “sleepy” and wanted to be in their room. S1 suggested R1 sleep, and approximately an hour later R1 used their pendant alarm and started to present with blurry vision, at this time emergency services were activated. Further interviews with S1 indicated that they did not force R1 to stay in their room and instead suggested they get sleep when R1 stated they were feeling tired. Review of R1 chart notes indicated once R1 complained of blurry vision their vitals were taken and emergency services were immediately activated.

No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted with Regional Director of Operations, whose signature on form confirms receipt.

SUPERVISORS NAME: Victoria Bertozzi
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Elias Magdaleno
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/27/2026
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/27/2026
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 2 of 2