1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | continued from 9099....
During an additional LPA visit, LPA interviewed R1 a second time to ask about staff grabbing them but R1 did not have recollection of the event and did not remember speaking with LPA. Due to conflicting information, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Allegation regarding reporting requirements. Based on LPA interview with involved parties , CCL is unable to provide sufficient collaboration regarding allegation. Licensee was unavailable to interview and additional interview was not sufficient to substantiate allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies cited.
Copy of report given and read.
|