<meta name="robots" content="noindex">
Department of
SOCIAL SERVICES

Community Care Licensing


COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT

Facility Number: 486803822
Report Date: 08/19/2026
Date Signed: 08/25/2026 12:17:02 PM

Substantiated


STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
CCLD Regional Office, 1450 NEOTOMAS AVENUE, STE. 100
SANTA ROSA, CA 95405
This is an official report of an unannounced visit/investigation of a complaint received in our office on
04/14/2026 and conducted by Evaluator Jill Nakagawa
PUBLIC
COMPLAINT CONTROL NUMBER: 21-AS-20260414110307
FACILITY NAME:MAGNOLIA COURTFACILITY NUMBER:
486803822
ADMINISTRATOR:HIQUIANA, KRISTINEFACILITY TYPE:
740
ADDRESS:1111 ULATIS DRTELEPHONE:
(707) 447-7100
CITY:VACAVILLESTATE: CAZIP CODE:
95687
CAPACITY:146CENSUS: 90DATE:
08/19/2026
ANNOUNCEDTIME BEGAN:
11:30 AM
MET WITH:Kristine Hiquiana, AdministratorTIME COMPLETED:
12:51 PM
ALLEGATION(S):
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Staff do not answer residents calls for assistance timely

INVESTIGATION FINDINGS:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
**This is an amended report***

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa conducted an investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Administrator Kristine Hiquiana on 8/19/2026 during an Informal Office meeting to discuss findings.

The complaint alleges that Staff do not answer residents calls for assistance timely. The reporting party states that call bells are not answered timely. LPA reviewed a sample of the facility's pendant/call bell system event reports and found that pendants/call bells set off showed elapsed times exceeding a reasonable amount of response time.
(Continued on 9099-C)
Substantiated
Estimated Days of Completion:
SUPERVISORS NAME: Kimberley Mota
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Jill Nakagawa
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/25/2026
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/25/2026
This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years.
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 1 of 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
CCLD Regional Office, 1450 NEOTOMAS AVENUE, STE. 100
SANTA ROSA, CA 95405
This is an official report of an unannounced visit/investigation of a complaint received in our office on
04/14/2026 and conducted by Evaluator Jill Nakagawa
PUBLIC
COMPLAINT CONTROL NUMBER: 21-AS-20260414110307

FACILITY NAME:MAGNOLIA COURTFACILITY NUMBER:
486803822
ADMINISTRATOR:HIQUIANA, KRISTINEFACILITY TYPE:
740
ADDRESS:1111 ULATIS DRTELEPHONE:
(707) 447-7100
CITY:VACAVILLESTATE:CAZIP CODE:
95687
CAPACITY:146CENSUS: DATE:
08/19/2026
UNANNOUNCEDTIME BEGAN:
11:30 AM
MET WITH:Kristine Hiquiana, AdministratorTIME COMPLETED:
12:51 PM
ALLEGATION(S):
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Staff did not administer medication according to physician’s orders
Unqualified staff administering residents medication.
Staff do not follow residents special food order
Staff do not provide timely meals to resident
Staff did not ensure there was a skilled professional to meet residents diabetes needs resulting in hospitalization
INVESTIGATION FINDINGS:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
***This is an amended report***
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa conducted an investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Administrator Kristine Hiquiana on 8/19/2026 during an Informal Office meeting to discuss findings.

The complaint alleges that Staff do not follow resident’s special food order. The complainant states that R1 is a vegetarian and not being provided sufficient protein options, requiring R1 to purchase supplemental food. LPA reviewed R1’s Pre-placement Appraisal which states that R1 is on a modified diet. LPA inspected the facility's menu and found that the menu was limited but there were consistently choices to meet the residents’ special dietary requirements.
(Continued on 9099-C)
Unsubstantiated
Estimated Days of Completion:
SUPERVISORS NAME: Kimberley Mota
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Jill Nakagawa
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/25/2026
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/25/2026
This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years.
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 2 of 4
Control Number 21-AS-20260414110307
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
CCLD Regional Office, 1450 NEOTOMAS AVENUE, STE. 100
SANTA ROSA, CA 95405
FACILITY NAME: MAGNOLIA COURT
FACILITY NUMBER: 486803822
VISIT DATE: 08/19/2026
NARRATIVE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
(Continued from 9099-A)
****This is an amended report****
Based on LPA’s observation of the dining room staff who help residents with their orders and the facility menu the allegation that Staff do not follow resident’s special food order is Unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleges that Staff do not provide timely meals to resident. The complainant states that on multiple occasions, R1 requested food and received none for hours, LPA reviewed R1’s care plan which states that R1 is independent and able to come to the dining room for meals and is able to order meals for room service. LPA reviewed records from food services and found meals delivered to R1's room when R1 did not attend the dining room. Based on LPA’s review of records and interviews conducted the allegation that Staff do not provide timely meals to resident is Unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleges that Staff did not administer medication according to physician’s orders and unqualified staff administering resident’s medication. The complainant states on April 9, 2026, R1 was given medication that is prescribed to be given at night. R1 also reported that staff administering medications do not appear to know what medications they are giving, raising concerns about competency and verification processes. LPA reviewed the Medication Administration Records (MAR) for the date in question. According to the MAR the medication in question was administered in the evening by Staff. In addition, reporting party stated that R1 reported that staff administering medications do not appear to know what medications they are giving. LPA reviewed the training records for staff members administering medications and all had received the required training as per regulation. Based on the MAR, the centrally stored medication record of prescriptions ordered by R1’s physicians and the training records of medication technicians the allegations that Staff did not administer medication according to physicians’ orders and Unqualified staff are administering residents’ medication are Unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleges that Staff did not ensure there was a skilled professional to meet residents’ diabetes needs resulting in hospitalization. The complainant states that R1 was transported to the hospital due to in increased blood glucose level after not receiving medication per physician’s order. LPA reviewed facility records and found that R1 did receive testing and medications as prescribed. Based on interviews and a review of medication records, the allegation that Staff did not ensure a skilled professional to meet residents’ diabetes needs resulting in hospitalization is Unsubstantiated.

SUPERVISORS NAME: Kimberley Mota
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Jill Nakagawa
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/25/2026
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/25/2026
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 3 of 4
Control Number 21-AS-20260414110307
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
CCLD Regional Office, 1450 NEOTOMAS AVENUE, STE. 100
SANTA ROSA, CA 95405
FACILITY NAME: MAGNOLIA COURT
FACILITY NUMBER: 486803822
VISIT DATE: 08/19/2026
NARRATIVE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
(Continued from 9099)

The records reviewed by LPA indicate that calls for assistance are answered in an average of 6 – 7 minutes but there are also a substantial number of calls that are going unanswered for up to an hour or more, which is not timely or safe for residents requiring assistance. Based on LPA’s observations, interviews conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 8, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.”)

Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 of California Regulation. Appeal rights given. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties.


(Continued on 9099-A)

SUPERVISORS NAME: Kimberley Mota
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Jill Nakagawa
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/25/2026
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/25/2026
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 4 of 4
Control Number 21-AS-20260414110307
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
CCLD Regional Office, 1450 NEOTOMAS AVENUE, STE. 100
SANTA ROSA, CA 95405

FACILITY NAME: MAGNOLIA COURT
FACILITY NUMBER: 486803822
DEFICIENCY INFORMATION FOR THIS PAGE:
VISIT DATE: 08/19/2026
Deficiency Type
POC Due Date /
Section Number
DEFICIENCIES
PLAN OF CORRECTIONS(POCs)
Type A
08/20/2026
Section Cited
CCR
87303(i)(1)(2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
87303(i)(1)(2)Maintenance and Operation. Facilities licensed for 16 or more and/or facilities that have separate floors or buildings shall have a signal system which meets specified requirements. Facility has an emergency call bell system set up for residents to use as needed and/or in an emergency.This requirement is not met as evidenced by:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
POC: LIcensee/Administrator to ensure that all required facility staff are trained on the emergency call bell alarm system and are following facility's policy and procedures and ensuring a timely response in answering resident's emergency alarms and ensuring they are meeting resident's needs in a timely manner-ensuring that resident's needs, health and safety are being addressed appropriately and within regulations. Submit plan of correction regarding ensuring facility's policy of the emergency call bell system used by residents and written plan of future compliance.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Based on investigation, file reviews, interviews, Licensee failed to ensure facility staff are responding to pendants/call bells in a timely manner. LPA reviewed the facility's emergency alarm pendant/call bell system event report and found multiple instances of responses tocall bells taking
an hour or more. This is an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Submit future compliance plan no later than 8/20/2026. Proof of completed plan of correction by 8/27/2026.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment.
SUPERVISOR'S NAME: Kimberley Mota
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Jill Nakagawa
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/19/2026
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/19/2026
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 1 of 1