1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 3 of 3
Allegation: Facility interrupted Hospice Care Services for resident
Statements received revealed resident POA’s were told by the Direct Hospice Care Group and Parkrose Staff (S2) that Parkrose Gardens of Fairfield had requested the transfer of hospice services to Direct Hospice Care. Statements indicated resident POA’s contacted Parkrose Gardens of Fairfield to inquire after the transfer of hospice services, but facility staff did not give POA’s a clear answer.
POA (#1) for resident (R1) was contacted by phone from an individual with Direct Hospice Care group, who was requesting a transfer of hospice services. R1 was actively dying and already receiving hospice services from a hospice agency. POA #1 received paperwork to transfer hospice services via email from Direct Hospice Group on the evening of Thursday 09/01/2022. POA #1 signed the transfer hospice paperwork via DocuSign. POA#1 visited R1 at Parkrose Gardens of Fairfield on Tuesday 09/06/2022. POA#1 discovered R1 had been without hospice services since 09/01/2022 as R1’s hospice services were terminated with their hospice agency to be transferred to Direct Hospice Care group.
R1's hospice services were disrupted between 09/01/2022 to 09/06/2022 as Direct Hospice Care group did not provide any hospice services during that time period. POA#1 contacted the hospice agency they were initially receiving services from and reinstated the hospice services for R1. POA#1 disclosed to LPA, that they continued to receive “harassing” phone calls, text messages and emails from the Direct Hospice Care group to transfer R1 to their services, POA#1 had declined several times to transfer hospice service providers for R1. On the morning of 09/09/2022, R1 was pronounced dead at Parkrose Gardens of Fairfield.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews conducted, the facility did not receive written consent from the resident's designated representatives/responsible party prior to releasing resident confidential records, the facility did not safeguard resident records due to providing resident's confidential information to Direct Hospice Care group which S1 invited into the facility and recommended, and the facility's actions resulted in the disruption of Hospice Care Services for resident. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
Appeal Rights Provided. Deficiencies cited (see LIC9099-D page) from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted with Ensuida Real, Activity Director whose signature below confirms receipt of report
|