1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | An interview was conducted with Staff 1 (S1) on 3/04/25. S1 stated that the typical discipline approach at the facility is to implement a time out in which the Licensee would sit with the child and discuss the situation with the child. S1 stated that they also redirect children from the situation and use positive reinforcement. S1 stated she has not observed any inappropriate forms of punishment used at the facility that would violate a child’s personal rights. S1 stated that C1 was never left alone at any time.
During the investigation, the LPA conducted interviews with Parents (P1 - P6) on 03/03/25 and 03/04/24, and they did not corroborate with the allegation. Parents disclosed they have not observed nor heard of any inappropriate forms of punishment. They all had positive comments regarding the Licensee and Staff and were very comfortable leaving their children at this day care.
During the LPA’s inspections to the facility, LPA toured the facility, made observations, and did not observe any evidence of personal rights violations, or any inappropriate forms of punishment. The Licensee and S1 were communicating with the children at their eye level, and conducting outdoor and indoor playtime activities with the children.
Based on available information and interviews conducted, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or not occur, therefore, the allegation is determined to be Unsubstantiated.
There was no Title 22 deficiency cited based on the above findings. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed and discussed with Licensee, Alicia Ponce. Appeal Rights were provided.
Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days from today's visit. |