1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Children interviewed corroborated the allegation giving examples of nap time discipline in the form of intimidation or threat as follows: “Teachers say, “Please kids go to sleep or I’m going to call your mom or dad.”, “They ask me to be quieter and that I might get a thinking time after nap.” and “Teachers say, “You’re not napping, you will get a thinking time.” Thinking time is a time out, outside, or inside. If you don’t make the right choice, they talk to your Mommy or Daddy at pick up. You have to stay quiet on your bed until wake-up time.” S2 stated during an interview at 12:41pm, “We don't have a non-napping program because of staffing. We don't have enough staff. We need to be able to clean the room and keep an eye on them. If children are not quiet for 2 hours, we check in with their parents and ask for their help… If a child has a hard day, we do ask parents to pick them up early because we can't provide one on one care.”
During the investigation, LPA interviewed seven former clients (A1- A7) between 08/09/23 and 10/12/23. Former clients interviewed stated that they were asked to pick up their child on more than one occasion because their child was not resting quietly or not sleeping. A former client stated that she was told by staff that staff needed to take a lunch break, so they needed the children to sleep. It has been corroborated through interviews with children and former clients that staff have used intimidation with children, by way of threats of calling parents or giving children “thinking times” as a form of discipline for not napping. Interviews with staff corroborate that they rely on children napping as a means of meeting staffing ratios so that staff can take lunch breaks. Title 22 states in part states, “The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: To be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, intimidation, ridicule, coercion, threat, mental abuse or other actions of a punitive nature including but not limited to: interference with functions of daily living including eating, sleeping or toileting; or withholding of shelter, clothing, medication or aids to physical functioning.”
Based on information obtained from interviews during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22 is cited on the attached LIC 9099-D.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report was read and discussed with the facility’s licensee/director, Evelyn Contreas. Appeal rights were provided.
A notice of site visit was given to licensees and must remain posted on, or immediately adjacent to, the interior side of the main door for 30 days.
|