1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099…
Based on records review provided from Heartland Hospice dated from July 29, 2020 until August 1, 2020 no signs of abuse or neglect from care staff was observed. Based on records review of R1’s service notes dated December 13, 2019 from Kindred at Home indicated that R1 had a history of falls with an injury in the past year. Also, per service notes dated December 31, 2019 R1 had an un-witnessed fall. On June 12, 2020 R1 had another un-witnessed fall with a scrap on forehead, responsible party was notified. However, LPA reviewed incident report logs for this facility, and it was determined that incident reports were not submitted to CCL. Administrator could not provide proof that incidents were reported to CCL. LPA will address reporting requirements on a case management inspection. A finding that the complaint allegations “Staff neglect resulting in resident developing pressure injuries while in care” is unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding allegation of resident developed a bacterial infection while in care. Reporting Party further reported that the resident also developed more pressure injuries but was not sure where the pressure injuries were located. Based on records review of home health care notes dated June 2, 2020 some redness without any sign of infection, no open sores or broken skin was observed on R1’s coccyx. On July 30, 2020 Heartland Hospice records indicated that R1 was admitted to hospice services with a diagnosis of MRSA (of the heel). However, R1 was receiving care from home health and no signs of actual or potential abuse or neglect from staff was observed. A finding that the complaint allegations “Resident developed a bacterial infection while in care” is unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding allegation of Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings. Reporting party alleges that resident’s (R1) ring was stolen and when they insisted the staff returned a ring, but it wasn’t the same ring. Reporting party provided pictures of the ring dated February 20, 2020 located on R1’s finger; Also, reporting party provided a picture dated October 20, 2020 of a different ring that it was given to them. LPA reviewed records of LIC621 form which is used by facility to document resident’s personal property and valuables upon resident’s admission. LIC621 form indicated that only 1 item was documented and described as Audio Aid VA dated November 15, 2017, the form was signed between Administrator and responsible party. Interviews conducted with staff indicated that R1’s personal belongings were collected by responsible party after R1 passed away. Based on records review and interviews conducted with staff and responsible party, LPA was unable to either prove or disprove the above allegations. A finding that the complaint allegations “Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings ” is unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Continues on LIC9099C...
|