1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099...Regarding allegation of facility is not kept clean and sanitary. The Department was provided with photographs as supportive evidence of bathroom used by residents in care has mold in the ceiling, presence of excessive clothing that prevents the door from opening fully. LPA conducted 10-day visit on 5/5/26 and based on LPA's observations mold in bathroom was present and clothing in the staff room has not been removed, then S2 arrived to remove the hanger bar that was holding the clothing, and clothing bags that were still blocking the door from opening completely. Based on records review, LPA’s interviews conducted with facility staff (S1) it was confirmed that the resident’s bathroom ceiling has mold. Also, Administrative Assistant agreed stated that they are in the process of painting the ceiling in the bathroom due to steam when residents in care take showers. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal Rights Given.
Last allegation of resident care needs not being met. Per Reporting Party, on 5/1/26 a resident (R1) had a fall and remained on the floor overnight without assistance. Based on records review, the facility submitted an incident report on May 4, 2026, notifying the department that on April 30, 2026, around 6:00am, staff (S2) while calling residents for breakfast found R1 on the floor. However, the incident report did not address whether medical assistance was needed or not. On May 11, 2026, a second incident report was issued notifying the department that on May 7, 2026, around 12:50pm R1 complained of having pain in their left shoulder and wanted to call their case worker. Upon case worker’s arrival, they called the ambulance to take R1 to the hospital, where R1 was diagnosed with fracture of left radius initial encounter and followed up appointment with an orthopedic specialist. According to R1’s physician report dated 1/16/26, R1 is ambulatory, but has mobility limitations needing to use a cane due to immobility of left arm, and R1 has the capacity for self-care. Although R1’s admission agreement dated March 2, 2026, indicates that facility will provide continuous care and supervision. Based on LPA's observation, during visit conducted on May 5, 2026, R1 was observed walking around the facility without a cane. Based on LPA’s interviews conducted with Administrative Assistant, R1 does not have a current care plan on file. LPA conducted confidential interviews with residents (R1 & R2) where it was confirmed that during the first incident, R1 fell from their bed about 2am, remained on the floor until 6am when S2 found them on the floor, then there was a second fall incident that resulted in R1 to sustain a fracture of their left arm. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal Rights Given. The Department will review documentation obtained to determine if additional civil penalties are needed. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and copy of this report was given. |