1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Per record review and interviews, S3 reviewed medical documentation, current care plan, resident incidents, observation of care being provided to R1. S3 stated they took into consideration input from R1's responsible party on 9/28/20 during the assessment of R1. S3 used the worksheet tool, points system on care needs of the resident, and from this an updated care plan is created. Per interview with S1, and records review, the reassessment documents were provided to the responsible party(RP) on 10/2/2020, delivered by staff to the RP in a sealed envelope. Per review of a letter dated 10/2/2020, summary of the letter stated to the RP that to please notify administration staff of any family member and/or health care professional(s) that RP would like included in a care conference being set-up to discuss the new care plan and reassessment documentation with RP. Per S1, they had discussed with RP on 10/5/20 that the care conference would be a time to review and discuss the reassessment and care plan, and that RP could have someone/others there, a family member, Physician of the resident, other health care professional but at that time the RP told S1 that they would provide information at a later date. S1 stated to the LPA that no information was provided by RP to S1 or any other staff person of RP's family member or health care professional RP would like to be included and/or notified of the care conference.
Per record reviews, LPA observed a reassessment document, worksheet tool, and the service plan from the reassessment started on 9/28/20, and completed 10/2/20 by S3, an RN. LPA also interviewed reporting party; Reporting party gave conflicting information to the information obtained from other parties during the investigation. RP does not agree with the reassessment that was done, the increased care needs and services, and the increased fees that were noted in documents received on 10/2/2020.
Based on LPA's observations, record reviews, interviews with staff, and conflicting information obtained from other related parties, there is insufficient information to prove or disprove the allegation of Resident was not properly reassessed. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. |