1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099A…
The fiduciary expressed their confidence if a noteworthy change in C1’s condition occurs, they would be made aware of it immediately. During interviews with house manager provided proof of consistent online communication between C1's responsible party and facility staff about C1’s change of condition.
A finding that the complaint allegations “facility did not notify responsible party regarding resident's change in condition” is unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
During investigation LPA conducted interviews with staff and various outside parties, reviewed incident reports, facility records including C1’s personal plan. Complainant alleges that the facility did not seek medical attention for client in a timely manner. Per Reporting party, C1 had a hospitalization back in 2018 where they almost die from an infection. During records review, the facility provided health care documentation and C1’s Individual Program Plan (IPP) dated 9/23/2018 confirmed that C1 was hospitalized. However, medical records and IPP did not indicate that the facility neglected to seek medical attention in a timely manner resulting in C1’s hospitalization. Based on records review, C1 had been seen by their Physician in a regular basis and has attended to their scheduled dental and medical appointments. A finding that the complaint allegation that facility did not seek medical attention for client in a timely manner is unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
|