1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continues from LIC9099...
Based on interviews, there were no concerns been raised related with care and supervision provided by the facility staff including any incident of restraining residents with belts. During the visit, LPA observed some residents do have belts in their wheelchair and inquired about them. According to interviews conducted with staff (S1 & S2), the belts are used as a tool to assist residents with transfers between their wheelchairs to their beds, they are worn around the waist in conjunction with Hoyer lift and the facility have two staff to provide support to the residents in care. LPA conducted confidential interviews with outside parties, who provided a letter dated 7/17/2023 from R1’s responsible party to facility licensee requesting the facility to don’t allow resident from leaving the facility with other people due to medical reasons and requesting staff to supervise R1 when there are more than two people visiting them due to combative behavior after a couple incidents where R1 was observed acting combative after visits. Per Licensee, they are allowing visitors and providing space for them to have privacy, but they do not allow visitors to take R1 out of the facility as indicated per their physician report. Based on records review, LPA have reviewed R1’s physician’s report dated 7/18/23, where it was revealed that R1 does have a motor impairment that needs assistance with activity of daily living (ADLs) and have a non-ambulatory status. Also, has a history of skin breakdown condition, they are not able to leave facility unassisted with family for medical appointments only. R1’s care plan dated 8/16/24 confirms that they are two people assist with transfers. The facility provided LPA with LIC500 Personnel Record and staff schedule for the month of August 2024 revealed that the facility does have two staff per morning and afternoon shift and one staff for night shift to ensure the safety and well-being of residents with mobility challenges. Based on LPA’s observation, there was no information or concern that could revealed that any of the incidents above mentioned have happened at a prior date. A finding that the complaint allegation of staff is restraining resident in care is unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No citations during today's visit. |