1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099...
Based on interviews conducted with facility Administrative Assistant it was determined that the facility was notified that R1 was exposed to a person who had a positive test result for Covid19, then it was instructed by the Licensee to contact R1’s day program to obtain additional information and after three unsuccessful contacts, so the licensee advise staff to follow their facility protocol to isolate R1 in their room until it was clear if R1 was positive or not to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care, R1 was isolated in their room for three days as stated in their facility protocol as follow: “there shall be separation and care of residents whose illness requires separation, including quarantine or isolation, from others”. LPA was unable to find any supporting evidence that staff could or not have unlawfully confined R1 to their room due to contradictory information which it was not clear if resident was isolated or confined to their room due to Covid19 exposure. However, based on records review of facility daily care notes for the month of July, R1 was assisted with activities of daily living. A finding that the complaint allegation occurs of facility staff are unlawfully confining residents to rooms is unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Another allegation of facility staff is not adhering to resident care plans. According to the reporting party, R1 has a care plan that includes 1:1 supervision due to their high fall risk and dementia diagnosis, but on July 28, 2025, at around 9:10 AM, R1 was observed alone in their room without supervision. However, based on interviews conducted by LPA with the complainant it was revealed that they were under the impression that R1’s care plan included 1:1 supervision due to their diagnosis of dementia and higher fall risk, but there was no supporting evidence of such information in their agreement between the facility and R1’s responsible party. LPA obtained written communication between the facility and R1’s responsible party dated July 24, 2025, at 4:38pm regarding upcoming monthly payment increase effective August 1, 2025, due to significant increase of level of care to meet R1’s evolving needs including constant supervision due to high fall risk, two-person assistance for all transfers, wheelchair for mobility, total assistance with feeding (pureed diet), total assistance with toileting, showers, dressing, and personal hygiene, full medication management.
Continued on LIC9099C... |