1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | Licensing Program Analyst Leibert met with caregiver Ryanne for the purpose of delivering findings on the above captioned complaint allegation. The visit was conducted via tele - visit due to the COVID - 19 precautions. Complainant (C1) alleges that C1 paid Administrator (A1) with check in the amount of $6000.00 dated 5/14/2020. C1 paid A1 in the amount of $6000.00 with another check dated 5/27/2020 when the first check of 5/14 was returned for insufficient funds. At some point, both checks were paid by the bank which resulted in a total of $12,000.00 paid to A1. This resulted in an overpayment of $6,000.00, according to C1. Cancelled checks; text messages, and copies of letters have been submitted by C1 in support of the claim that Facility has not issued a proper refund. This Agency has attempted to make contact with A1 on numerous occasions via letters, e-mails, and phone messages left on A1's personal cell phone. To date, no response has been received. Based upon the records reviewed, statements made, and lack of response from the Administrator, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED.The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 9099D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted and appeal of rights provided.
|