1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The Department spoke with the VP by phone on April 22, 2020. In that discussion, the VP denied that he had instructed his directors of philanthropy to insert the private financial information of residents into eTapestry, a program CLC and its communities use for donor management or that his directors should compile a spreadsheet of this information. He stated instead that in a November meeting with all the directors of philanthropy of the various CLC communities, he provided the directors with a spreadsheet for discussion purposes only.
The Department reviewed a spreadsheet which called for private financial information from residents including monthly income, real estate, savings/CD, stock holdings, etc. The Department was advised that while the spreadsheet had contained these categories of data from Colorado residents, similar information was never gathered from California residents. The Department has found no evidence that other California communities inserted private financial data in the spreadsheet or eTapestry database. The Department does not know whether the information was provided at the insistence of the VP, but it indisputably was provided for purposes of fundraising.
There is no question that the kind of financial information at issue here is protected by these laws and regulations. Health and Safety Code section 1569.269 entitles residents “to confidential treatment of their records and personal information and to approve their release, except as authorized by law.”” California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 87506 subdivision (c) provides that “All information and records obtained from or regarding residents shall be confidential. (1) The licensee shall be responsible for storing active and inactive records and for safeguarding the confidentiality of their contents. The licensee and all employees shall reveal or make available confidential information only upon the resident's written consent or that of his designated representative.” Continuing care contract residents enjoy these same rights. (See Health & Safety. Code section 1771.7(a).)
The question is whether the right to confidentiality in these records includes the right not to have private financial data originally gathered from residents for purposes of admission and retention, transferred to corporate fundraisers to use in approaching the residents as donors. Based on interviews, observations and a review of documentation the allegation, “Residents in care are being financially abused” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. The preponderance of evidence standards has not been met.
A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met.
Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22 Division 6 no deficiencies are being cited. An exit interview was conducted with Ryan Hust via telephone and a copy of this report was provided via email and an electronic email read receipt confirms receiving these documents. |