1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s file and observed multiple medical records dating from March 2023 through October 2023 diagnosing R1 with an unspecified, itchy rash. LPA Moleski reviewed medical records for two other residents (R7, R8). R7 was prescribed an antihistamine for itchy spots, and R8 was diagnosed with a dry skin rash. LPA Moleski did not observe any skin rashes on residents other than R1.
During an interview, R1’s responsible party said R1 has not had scabies.
LPA Moleski interviewed six staff members (S1-S6). Of these, all six staff members denied that staff are rough with residents and denied that staff yell at residents. S1 and S5 said staff sometimes do have to speak louder for residents who are hard of hearing. LPA Moleski interviewed six residents (R1-R6). R2 said one staff member was too rough with R2. LPA Moleski interviewed R2’s responsible party, who said that R2 exaggerated the incident described. R3 said staff sometimes yell at residents if residents are yelling at them. R4 said staff sometimes yell at residents to get their attention, but said staff do not yell in a mean way. R5 said one staff member yells at R5.
The department has determined the following as it relates to the allegations that staff did not prevent an outbreak of scabies, that staff handle residents in a rough manner, and that staff yell at residents:
Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED, which means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred.
No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left with Gaither. |