1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was alleged that resident’s hygiene is not being met. Based on interviews and the information that was gathered throughout the course of this investigation, this facility was deficient as evidenced that the restroom that was present in R1’s bedroom was locked and made inaccessible to Resident 1 (R1). It was learned that R1 was an individual who would constantly take showers in order to cope with any behaviors and would take several showers a day. It was learned that the facility management decided to not allow R1 to do so and did not make this coping behavior available to R1 any longer. As a result, R1’s hygiene care needs started to decline, and facility staff were reluctant to deal with R1’s behaviors as they started to increase in frequency. It was learned that facility staff were unable to properly deal with R1’s behaviors and felt that it was just easier to leave R1 alone and not deal with R1 if R1 refused to shower or conduct any of R1’s activities of daily living. Based on the information provided through interview, the facility did not meet the resident’s hygiene needs, therefore this allegation was SUBSTANTIATED.
It was alleged that the facility is in disrepair. Based on interviews and the information that was gathered throughout the course of this investigation, this facility was deficient as evidenced that the restroom that was present in R1’s bedroom had dried urine stains on the restroom floor, as well as urine stains on the walls surrounding the toilet. It was observed that the restroom tile floor was starting to become uneven due to the excessive moisture that was present and needed to be repaired/replaced. In addition, it was observed that the walls surrounding the toilet needed to be replaced/repaired due to the excessive urine stains. Based on observation and information gathered through interviews, the facility was in disrepair, therefore this allegation was SUBSTANTIATED. This allegation was previously investigated and cite on XXXX, therefore no deficiency for this finding will be issued on this day.
It was alleged that the facility was malodorous. Based on interviews and the information that was gathered throughout the course of this investigation, this facility was deficient as evidenced that the restroom that was present in R1’s bedroom contained dried urine stains on the restroom floor with additional urine stains on the walls surrounding the toilet. There was the presence of a strong urine odor upon entry into this restroom. Based on observation and information gathered through interviews, the facility was malodorous, therefore this allegation was SUBSTANTIATED
Based on observations, review of records and information gathered through interviews, the above allegations were SUBSTANIATED meaning that there was a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred as alleged. The following deficiencies were cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with facility representative and a copy of this report was provided along with appeal rights.
The Facility Designated Administrator asked for all documentation to this visit to be sent to his email and did not sign any paperwork during the time of visit
|