1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to facility records, R1 was supposed to have hourly status checks, but R1 had been gone for almost three hours before caregivers realized R1 had eloped. According to medical records, R1 sustained a basilar skull fracture, distal left radius/ulna fracture, LI compression fracture, scalp laceration requiring staples and a subdural hematoma. S1 and S2 both admitted that they failed to follow elopement procedures.
As a result of this investigation, LPA Lund finds allegation to be Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid due to the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations.
Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, the following deficiencies, and immediate civil penalty have been issued. The circumstances of this complaint are being evaluated for enhanced civil penalties.
The licensee was informed that a civil penalty assessment based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e) is currently under review (pending determination) and may be assessed on a later date, as a result of the resident having serious bodily injury while in care of the facility. Once civil penalty assessment has been determined, CCL will return on a future date to assess the civil penalty.
Exit interview conducted and report provided. Appeals rights printed |