1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | However, 5 out 5 staff members report that the residents may have unwitnessed falls as they cannot prohibit the resident from falling but can assist to mitigate the falls. In addition, a review of the resident’s care plan dated on 05/26/2025, states that the resident may be a fall potential however the fall risk was scored as 0. This was acknowledged and signed by the resident responsible party on 05/26/2025. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident resulting in resident falling.
As a result of this investigation, this Department found the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated meant that although the allegations may have happened or was valid, there was not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Allegation: Staff did not assist with resident’s bathroom needs.
It was alleged that staff did not assist with resident’s bathroom needs. During the course of this investigation, the department conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on interviews conducted with 5 staff members. 5 out 5 staff members deny that they did not assist with the resident’s bathroom needs. 5 out 5 staff members state that they assist residents as needed. 5 out 5 staff members state that residents may have to wait for a couple minutes to get assistance however will always assist the residents. An interview with 5 residents were conducted. 5 out 5 residents denied not being assisted with their bathroom needs. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that staff did not assist the residents with their bathroom needs.
As a result of this investigation, this Department found the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated meant that although the allegations may have happened or was valid, there was not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
|