1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Additionally, interviews conducted did not reveal any other evidence of staff not treating residents with dignity and respect in any other form. As a result, the preponderance of evidence standard is not met, and this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Allegation: Facility did not provide client food meeting nutritional guidelines. LPA conducted interviews, observation, and record reviews as noted above. Record reviews revealed staff have consistently offered various food choices and to accommodate resident1 (R1) food preferences and diet including but not limited to: Soups, vegetables, fruits, bread, and beverages. Interviews and record reviews further revealed R1 has chosen to purchase own food from an outside source. An observation conducted revealed facility has appropriate amounts of food items on hand to meet general nutritional guidelines for residents' diets, and matching current menu items. Observation conducted further revealed that staff offers diabetic options to appropriate residents in care. Interviews conducted did not reveal any corroborated statements of staff not offering residents food appropriate to meet regulatory nutritional guidelines. As a result, there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude that facility is not providing a resident with food meeting nutritional guidelines, therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A finding of unsubstantiated means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with house manager and a copy of this report was provided.
|