1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | On 07/24/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valerie Mireles conducted an unannounced complaint inspection. The purpose of the inspection was to deliver investigation findings. LPA met with Licensee Claribel Gomez. A tour of the facility was conducted, and a census was taken.
This agency investigated the complaint alleging ‘Provider left daycare child crying for an extended period of time.’ During the investigation, LPA visually observed the daycare and conducted interviews with the Licensee, daycare children, the complainant, and parents of children in care. The information received during interviews and observation did not corroborate allegation, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 3, no deficiency is cited.
Exit interview conducted with the Licensee Claribel Gomez. Appeal rights were provided and discussed. A Notice of Site Visit was given and will be posted for 30 days. |