1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff does not ensure resident’s furniture is free of mold.
It was alleged that the staff does not ensure resident’s furniture is free of mold. During the course of this investigation LPA toured the facility and conducted interviews. Based on interviews conducted it was learned that there was a stain in a residents bed that was part of the wood when the bed set was assembled. LPA toured the resident bedrooms and the LPA did not find any signs of mold in any bedrooms at this time. LPA toured R1’s bedroom where it was alleged that the resident’s furniture had mold. LPA observed several wood stains and dots that did not appear to be mold. It was denied by staff that the resident’s rooms have been treated with mold. LPA conducted an interview with 4 residents. 4 out of 4 residents state that there rooms have been clean and free of mold. Based on the information gathered it is unclear that the staff does not ensure resident’s furniture is free of mold.
Staff do not allow resident's to have access to dryer.
It was alleged that the staff do not allow resident’s to have access to the dryer. During the course of this investigation LPA conducted interviews. 4 out of 4 residents stated that they have access to do their own laundry at any time with assistance from the staff. 4 out 4 residents state that in the summer they like to dry their clothes on a clothes line outside. 4 out 4 residents states that they have the option to do their own laundry. 3 out 3 staff deny that they do not allow resident’s to have access to the dryer. It was also disclosed that most laundry is conducted when the resident’s are out at their respective day programs. Based on the information gathered, it is unclear that the staff do not allow residents to have access to the dryer.
As a result of this investigation, this Department found the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated meant that although the allegations may have happened or was valid, there was not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
There were no deficiencies observed or cited at this time. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of the 9099 and 9099-C was provided to the facility.
|