1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | 9099 CONT>>>>>>>
LPA interviewed OM, ED, and two residents. LPAs reviewed documents of communication logs. Communication logs notated when calls were received, who received them, and brief nature of contact. LPAs observed logs notating notes from caregivers. Documents show when/if a caregiver or staff had communication with responsible parties of resident. LPAs found no evidence that facility was not responding to calls in a timely manner.
LPAs conducted a physical plant inspection on 3/29/2021. LPAs observed comfortable, well maintained furnishings for the residents in both the common areas and in residents rooms. LPAs observed 2 rooms in Assisted Living area and 2 rooms in Memory Care Area. LPAs interviewed 8 residents, 7 of which responded to be satisfied with furnishings. The 8th resident did not respond to question. LPAs found no evidence that comfortable furnishing were not provided to residents.
Therefore, the allegation that the facility was not responding to calls in a timely manner and the facility did not provide comfortable furnishings is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. There was not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegation occurred as reported therefore the allegation was found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report 9099-A and Appeal Rights was provided to the Administrator via email. |