1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on interviews, Responsible Party (RP) stated Resident #1 (R1) does not like facility’s meals. RP stated R1 eats an alternative meal, which is peanut butter and jelly sandwiches quite often. On 11/05/2020, LPA T. White interviewed 5 residents regarding adequate food services. Based on interviews, 2 of 6 residents stated the food does not change and needs improvements, LPA observed facility’s menu is updated and there are alternative meal items for the residents to choose daily. Based on documentation and interview with Staff #4(S4), the facility has a number of alternative meals for the residents to choose. However, 3 of 6 residents stated they enjoy the food and staff accommodates food choices. LPA left messages with 1 of 6 residents and was unable to speak with resident.
Based on information obtained, LPA determined these allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED- means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. There are no citations being issued today.
Exit interview conducted with Administrator, Melina Nunez and copy of report provided. |