1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | There is a walkway from the front of the facility to the back that has steps on one side and a ramp on the other. The steps are marked with tape and the tape was peeling, but it does not pose a risk because the steps were still clearly marked. LPA cannot prove or disprove the allegation.
2. Complainant stated the stove top vent above the stove tops and the clothes dryer were not ventilated and emitted toxic fumes or did not ventilate toxic fumes. LPA contacted Sutter County Building Inspector and Sutter County Fire Inspector. The stove top itself is electric and does not emit toxic fumes. The fan over the stove top is a fan that blows air away from the food and is not required to vent to the outside. The clothes dryer at the time of the complaint being made was installed in the garage was electric and not vented to the outside because the person who delivered the unit did not install it properly. LPA contacted the company that built the clothes dryer and the Sutter County Building Inspector, and both stated the clothes dryer does not emit toxic fumes. The only concern was lint build-up and damp air being emitted from the clothes dryer. The licensee has since switched it to a ventless clothes dryer. However, based on the above the two issues do not pose a danger to residents. Complainant stated caregivers would leave the sharp knives in the kitchen unlocked and one of the residents was able to get into the drawer. LPA was given a time frame ending roughly April 2024. LPA was unable to confirm the events. Complainant alleged the hot water heater was dangerous and Licensee stated she has not had any issues with the hot water heater, nor has she had any complaints about the hot water heater. LPA did not receive any complaints about the hot water heater from the residents who were interviewed. LPA did not observe any issues with the hot water heater. LPA cannot prove or disprove the above.
3. Complainant stated the toilets plugged all the time and overflowed and the caregivers didn’t clean any of it up. Interviews all stated that didn’t happen. LPA was unable to interview past caregivers. LPA cannot prove or disprove the allegation.
Due to the information gathered, LPA cannot determine the allegations: 1 Facility is in disrepair; 2. Licensee does not ensure a safe environment for residents in care; 3. Licensee does not ensure a sanitary environment for residents in care. LPA finds allegation to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. |