1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | 2. The Department conducted an investigation into the allegation. The investigation included a review of R1’s medical records, hospital records, and interviews with relevant parties. Based on a review of the medical and hospital records, there was no documentation or indication in these records that R1 was dehydrated upon admission or during care. Interviews conducted during the investigation included staff members, facility management, and other relevant parties. A witness stated that R1 appeared severely dehydrated on the day they were sent to the hospital. However, the facility staff denied this claim, indicating that R1’s condition was regularly monitored, and no signs of severe dehydration were observed prior to the transfer. The Department noted that the accounts provided during interviews were inconsistent. The witness’ assertion of severe dehydration conflicts with the medical documentation reviewed, which did not support this claim. Based on the evidence gathered, the Department finds that the allegation is unfounded. A finding that the complaint is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis.
3. The Department investigated an allegation that the Licensee accepted a resident whose care needs exceeded the level of care the facility could provide during the time frame from the facility’s opening to November 2023. Based on the investigation, the Department reviewed R1’s file, including the pre-admission appraisal. Pre-placement admission appraisal indicated that R1 was able to walk with a walker, able to eat with minimal assistance and supervision, required assistance with showering and using the bathroom, assistance with preparing medication and supervision when taking medication, and required a special diet. Based on the documentation at the time of admission, R1 was assessed to require assistance that fell within the facility’s capabilities under Title 22 Regulations. Based on the evidence gathered, the Department finds that the allegation is unfounded. A finding that the complaint is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis.
|