1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Four witnesses were interviewed on 3/24/25, 3/25/25 and 3/26/25. Three witnesses (W1-W3) stated the Licensee’s spouse (A1) spends days at the facility and nights at another address. One witness (W4) stated that A1 lives with in the home, but they were unsure where A1 is during the daytime. Two staff members (S1 and S2) were interviewed on 3/20/25 and 4/10/25. S1 stated that the spouse lived at the home until a domestic violence incident occurred. S2 stated they knew the Licensee was married and has seen A1 in the home after hours and on weekends. Five parents (P1-P5) were interviewed on 3/24/25 and 3/27/25. Two parents (P1 & P4) indicated they knew of the spouse (A1) and had seen A1 leaving the home and returning to the home. P1 stated that the spouse spent time at the home on the weekends and their children had attended the daycare on the weekend. P4 stated the spouse was at the facility at drop off and they would return at the time of pick up. During today’s inspection, the facility was toured and I did not observe any title 22 violations.LPA observed 6 children in care with two staff present.
Based on the evidence obtained, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
LPA Tammy Dutra informed licensee Vennesa Jackson that this report dated 4/17/25 documents one Type A citation which shall be posted for 30 consecutive days as there is an immediate risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of children in care.
|