1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The facility representative advised that the last medication training she can recall was a few years ago when a child who needed an EpiPen was enrolled. Since that time staff has remained consistent, and they have felt no need for retraining since instructions are attached to medication. 2 additional staff (S1, S2) and 3 children (C1-C3) were interviewed on 8/7/24 between 9:48am and 10:25am. None had any knowledge of accessible medication or diaper rash issues. S2 referenced the EpiPen training a few years ago, and S3 does not administer medications. S3 stated that either Daynnis or Jennah are always on site. LPA Friese toured the facility this date and observed the medication storage area, diapering area and obtained the facility roster, employee contact information and an admissions agreement. LPA Friese observed this agreement to include their medication policy. There was no prescription medication in the facility this date to inspect.
On 8/09/24, between 9:07 and 9:48, the director and 3 parents were interviewed (P1-P3). Director Daynnis Orduno denied the allegations and stated that there was a parent that recently picked up an EpiPen on a day their child wasn’t attending. They requested the EpiPen from an employee that happened to be in the building but works in the detached infant area, so it took longer than usual to retrieve from the kitchen cabinet. Dayniss stated that on days when an allergic child was attending, they accommodated them by not allowing the allergen in the facility for 24 hours prior and always made sure that trained staff was on site those days. She described her medication labeling requirements in accordance with what is stated in the admissions agreement. She claimed that all staff work cooperatively with parents when children have diaper rash, using the cream they provide and following the instructions given. Diaper changes are logged.
All 3 parents interviewed reported never having seen accessible medication, 2 described medication as being kept in the kitchen cabinet, and P1 was unaware of where the medication was kept. None expressed any issues with diaper rash or the diapering policy, with P2 being grateful for the center providing their child diapers when they ran out.
Based on interviews, record review and observation, it has been determined that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, therefore the findings are unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the licensee Dayniss Orduno. Appeal rights were provided.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. |