1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Seven parents were interviewed on 1/25/25, 2/4/25, and P1, P2, and P7 denied the allegation stating that sick children were not allowed to attend the facility that parents were told to keep their children home if the children were sick. P3, P4, and P6, confirmed the allegation stating that sick children were consistently allowed to attend the facility and not sent home if presenting signs of illness. P5 had no knowledge of the allegation stating that P5’s child only attended the facility for a couple days.
One child was interviewed on 11/8/24 and C1 denied the allegation stating that children are not sick when they are at the facility.
During today’s inspection, the facility was toured, and LPA observed 8 children in care.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Director Jessie Radcliff. Appeal rights were provided.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. |