1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | S1 stated that the other child walked toward the dramatic play area, prompting S1 to look at C1 and then scan forward toward the other child as S1 closed the Jack and Jill restroom door. S1 stated it was at that moment that the door closed on C1’s left pinky finger, causing a laceration and fracture. Based on the interview, LPA determined the incident was not intentional or malicious, S1 was maintaining visual supervision, and the incident was an isolated occurrence.
LPA was unable to gather sufficient evidence to determine that the daycare child sustained the injury due to staff neglect.
Although the allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Per Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1 of the California Code of Regulations, no deficiency is being cited during today’s inspection. Director Kimberly Sa was provided a copy of appeal rights. An exit interview was conducted, and the report was reviewed with Director Kimberly Sa. This report shall be made available to the public upon request. LIC 9213 Notice of Site Visit was provided and is required to be posted for 30 days. |