1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff do not ensure that the facilities food supply is of good quality
During the course of this investigation LPA Jensen inspected the food supply on 2 separate occasions. LPA Jensen did not observe any expired food. LPA Jensen did observe fruit and vegetables that appeared to be of good quality. LPA Jensen observed meal service on 2 separate occasions and snacks being served. The meals observed were balanced and included protein, starch, fruit and vegetables. LPA Jensen also observed freshly baked cookies being served for snack. LPA Jensen also interviewed 10 residents, none of which stated the food was of poor quality. While it is possible that there may have been an occasion wherein there was expired food or spoiled food on site there was no evidence found that it was served to residents. Based on LPA Jensen's observations of the food supply, observation of meal service and interviews conducted the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened, the preponderance of evidence does not prove it.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, appeal rights was given.
|