1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | FACILITY STAFF WERE NOT MEETING RESIDENTS' INCONTINENCE NEEDS. Based on observation, a review of records, and information gathered through interviews, It was determined that residents were left in wet depends for extended periods of time. Gel beads from soaked depends were found stuck to the residents’ bottoms showing that they were not being cleaned thoroughly between changings. Their red irritated skin also provided evidence that residents were left in these wet depends for long stretches of time.
FACILITY STAFF NOT CONDUCTING PLANNED ACTIVITIES FOR THE RESIDENTS. Based on interviews, observation and records review, it was learned that there weren't many activities in Memory Care. This LPA learned that there were items available for staff to use to conduct activities but as the Memory Care Director/Activities Director was part-time, there were usually only 1 or 2 caregivers working in Memory Care. Activities were not facilitated on a regular basis after 2:00 PM.
The above allegations were SUBSTANTIATED meaning that there was a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred as alleged. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (A)This poses an immediate Health and Safety risk to clients/residents in care. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk to clients/residents in care.
An Exit interview was conducted with Armando Rodriguez, Designated Facility Administrator.
A copy of this report and Appeal Rights provided.
|