1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The allegation of "Resident's family member did not receive any notification of the COVID-19 visitor policy" alleges R1's family member did not received any notification of the COVID-19 visitor policy. During the interview with the Administrator, they stated either mailed or emailed Individual #1 (I1), who is the responsible party for R1, the visitor policy. During the interview with I1, I1 stated they could not recall if the facility gave them a copy of the visitor policy but stated they were aware of the policy and obtained a copy of the visitor policy when they visited the facility. I1 stated they also gave R1's family member of copy of the policy. Based on the information obtained, the allegation of Resident's family member did not receive any notification of the COVID-19 visitor policy is deemed unsubstantiated at this time.
The allegation of " Facility staff convinced resident to change to a physician the facility" prefers alleges the facility convinced the resident to change physician's to a doctor who conducts visits at the facility. The administrator stated the resident changed physician's two or three weeks ago due to the family having a hard time getting the resident to appointments. The Administrator said the family member of R1 and I1 agreed to changing to a physician who conducts visits at the facility. During the interview with I1, I1 stated they and the family member agreed to the physician change. Based on the information obtained, the allegation of Facility staff convinced resident to change to a physician the facility is deemed unsubstantiated at this time.
On July 15, 2021 at 5:08 PM, LPA Lopez spoke with former licensee Mr. Patrick Treacy on the telephone and explained the complaint findings. LPA Lopez obtained a current mailing address for the licensee and advised a copy of the report and appeal rights would be mailed to the him for signature. |