1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC 9099
Interviews with facility staff confirmed that a dermatology appointment was scheduled and that a family member transported R1 to the appointment in April 2026. However, R1 refused to see a dermatologist to have their skin examined and was returned to the facility. Adding that to prevent trauma transfer, facility offered R1’s family to arrange a nurse practitioner to assess and provide wound care to R1 at the facility. R1’s Family Members (FM) stated that facility staff and home health nurses notified them of R1’s skin condition and they immediately scheduled a dermatologist appointment, however, R1 got agitated and refused to see the Dr. On 08/06/2026, R1's physician discussed a dermatology referral; however, R1's FM declined to proceed with the referral. FM understands that the skin lesion could worsen if it is not treated and other options are being discussed with facility staff. FM is satisfied with services provided to R1 and denied ever having a problem with Drs. appointments. Records reviewed established that facility staff communicated with R1’s family regarding R1’s dermatological condition and assisted in coordinating a dermatology appointment. As of 08/27/2026, R1 is receiving hospice services, and hospice nurses visiting R1 are providing wound care.
Based on the above information gathered although the allegations may be valid, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred; therefore, the allegations “Facility is not assisting resident with medical appointments” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided.
|