1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The facility continued to utilize the refrigerator, microwave, and used the outdoor grill to serve meals for breakfast and lunch. Interviews confirmed that dinners were primarily ordered out because dinners and staff kept a record of what was ordered. A review of meals revealed that the food offered was of variety and had several options. Interviews with family members and residents revealed no complaints regarding what was provided and stated that dietary preferences were met. Whereas some meals indeed included pizza and Chinese food, the facility also ordered grilled chicken, salads, sandwiches, rice, noodles, and appropriate sides. A review of medical assessments for residents confirmed that there were no prescribed diets. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that during renovations, the facility did not serve meals of nutritional value and quality. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Regarding the allegation: Facility does not have a functioning kitchen.
It was alleged that the facility did not have a functioning kitchen. It was confirmed that during the kitchen renovation, the facility still had use of the kitchen and microwave, and the staff used the outdoor grill to prepare meals. The facility provided most breakfasts and lunches, yet ordered out for dinner. As such, the facility implemented a plan in place to ensure that residents received three meals a day. Based on the information obtained, the facility continued to meet the resident care and dietary needs and ensured that residents received three meals a day during renovations, and the facility still had use of the refrigerator, microwave, and an outdoor grill as needed. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Regarding the allegation: Gas leaked resulting in setting off carbon monoxide detectors.
It was alleged that during renovations, there was a gas leak that set off the alarm. Interviews confirmed that a gas line was accidentally touched by one of the contractors, but staff claimed that they identified the smell immediately, and asked the contractors to remedy the situation. Staff claimed that they tended to the issue ‘right away’, opened all the doors and windows, and ensured that all staff and residents were safe. Yet, other interviews confirmed that the smell was strong, that it lingered in the air for several minutes, and that there was elevated concern as gas emissions can be dangerous. There were inconsistencies communicated regarding whether the carbon monoxide detectors were triggered as a result of the gas, yet the majority of interviews claimed that no alarm was triggered. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that due to negligence, gas leaked into the facility which resulted in setting off carbon monoxide detectors. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report issued. |