1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The LPA spoke with S1 over the phone at 10:21 a.m., who alleged that R1 was pacing back and forth and wanted to go outside. S1 alleged that they did not want to agitate R1, and alleged that they watched R1 leave the facility, and watched R1 walk across the street. S1 said they then decided to go across the street to remind R1 that it was not their home, and guided R1 back to the facility. S1 alleged that they were still 'keeping eyes' on R1. The LPA explained that if they claimed they were supervising R1, they have to be alongside or close to R1. The LPA explained that staying in the facility and watching R1 cross the street is not appropriate supervision, and reminded S1 that R1 could not leave the facility unassisted.
The LPA reviewed resident records at 9:34 a.m. and per the physician reports for all residents, reports indicated that 6/6 residents are unable to leave the facility without assistance.
Based on the information obtained, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that facility staff did not adequately supervise R1. This allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time.
Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D):
Exit interview conducted, today's reports and appeal rights were reviewed and issued. The Administrator authorized staff to sign the report. |