1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Report Continued from LIC 9099C...
It was also alleged that staff are not keeping hallway free of obstruction. It was reported that there are brooms and other objects in the hallways creating a hazard and concern for residents’ safety. During the visit on 03/17/2025, the LPA, along with the Residential Program Manager, conducted a walkthrough of the facility. The following was observed: the facility has a janitorial closet, which was locked and inaccessible to clients at the time of the visit. Brooms, mops, and other cleaning supplies were observed stored inside the janitorial closet. Staff interviews confirmed that all brooms and mops are properly stored when not in use. Furthermore, all hallways were observed to be clean and free of any obstructions. Based on observations and interviews, the Department has insufficient evidence to support the allegation of “staff not keeping hallway free of obstruction”. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
It was further alleged that there is Insufficient staffing. It was reported that staff is rotated between facilities; however, there are not enough to cover all houses. Per facility program, in Policy Title: Staffing it states that One (1) Residential Recovery Counselor is scheduled for the Casa on the day shift and two (2) Residential Recovery Counselors are scheduled on the evening and night shifts seven days a week. During the course of the investigation, the LPA obtained and reviewed timecards and staff schedules for the month of February 2025 and conducted interviews with both staff and clients. At the time of the complaint, there were at least two staff members scheduled for each shift in the AM, PM, and NOC shifts. Timecards confirmed that, although staff schedules varied, there was sufficient staffing to cover any unforeseen shortages. Record review and interviews further revealed that additional staff were available on-call, and outside agency staffing was also utilized as needed. Staff interviews indicated that staffing levels were consistently adequate as they were fully staffed. Staff reported that there were typically two to three staff members scheduled for each shift. In addition, facilities had floaters available who were able to move throughout the premises and provide assistance where needed. Client interviews confirmed the presence of two to three staff members per shift, including during the NOC shift. Additionally, three out of three clients interviewed reported no concerns regarding staffing or living at the facility. Furthermore, a review of Guardian records verified that all staff were fingerprint-cleared and associated with all on-site facilities, allowing them to work double shifts or be reassigned to different facilities as necessary. Based on the information obtained and reviewed during the course of the investigation, the Department has insufficient evidence to support the allegation of “insufficient staffing”. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Exit interview. A copy of the report was issued.
|